I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
后来，林木通的儿子找到了父亲的照片，发给杜耀豪。令杜耀豪最为惊讶的，是林木通的过度衰老，他去世时只有78岁，但照片里的他，看起来像是90岁老人。
。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08
据乌克兰国际文传电讯社2月27日消息，乌克兰总统泽连斯基在接受英国天空新闻频道采访时说，如果俄罗斯近期不同意举行乌美俄三方元首会晤，俄乌冲突将会“旷日持久”。
Anthropic did not immediately respond to Engadget's comment request. Earlier in the day, a spokesperson for the company said the contract Anthropic received after CEO Dario Amodei outlined Anthropic's position made “virtually no progress” on preventing the outlined misuses.